- From: Doug Schepers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:04:03 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
We have an ongoing proposal for alternate names on the wiki: https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/JSON_Vocabulary If this is simply a distinction between the JSON-LD names and the RDF `@context` (in other words, if we're only talking about the "spec" names and not what would be used in JSON-LD), I don't have an opinion about how these are named. If we're talking about the terms to be used in JSON-LD, I thought we had agreement long ago to remove the has/is prefaces. -- GitHub Notif of comment by shepazu See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/70#issuecomment-139118479
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 05:04:06 UTC