W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Annotation alsoKnownAs <uri>

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:50:25 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-153500406-1446587424-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 4 Nov 2015, at 01:43, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
wrote:
> 
> Proposal post-TPAC:
> 
> Use rel=via instead of rel=canonical in the model. This would be 
iana:via (json-ld key: via) on the Annotation, with the object being 
another URI for the Annotation.
> Rationale: rel=canonical is too strong. If the @id 
<https://github.com/id> is the deferenceable HTTP URI, and the 
referenced URI is just a UUID, then the canonical one is the HTTP URI 
already. Instead we want to say that we got this resource via this 
other resource. We could ALSO assert canonical if necessary, but that 
would require quite some coordination amongst systems. To me 
(personally, non editor, non chair, yadda yadda) that seems like 
something to add once we have deployment experience.
> 
> 

Right. We can try to formulate, formally, a feature as 'at risk' when 
going to CR, based on implementation experience, or something like 
that.





-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by iherman
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/21#issuecomment-153500406
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:50:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC