- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:56:46 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
azaroth42 has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation: == Editorial: Split model into vocab and model+json-ld == A proposal discussed at TPAC was to split the documentation that currently is instantiated in annotation-model into two pieces, one for the basic model and the JSON-LD serialization of that model, and a second for the vocabulary/ontology. Rationale: * This is what ActivityStreams does and the Social Web WG have very similar goals to us in terms of making the outcomes of the group accessible. * It helps with testing -- if we only normatively specify the JSON-LD profile, then that's all we need to test. The ontology can then be tested separately, without worrying about JSON-LD or any particular serialization. We would not need to test turtle representation of the model, for example, as it's just turtle. * It makes it easier to be specific in both -- the vocab doc can say things like rdfs:subPropertyOf and give domain and range, whereas the model and JSON-LD serialization can take out things that are acceptable-to-no-one like "URI" in the tables, the turtle serialization, and so forth. See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/97
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 19:56:53 UTC