W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Editorial: Split model into vocab and model+json-ld

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:15:22 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-153506439-1446588921-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> On 4 Nov 2015, at 04:42, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> 
> The proposal at TPAC was to auto-generate the documentation using 
the ontology plus a tool like LODE <http://www.essepuntato.it/lode>. 
There are several issues with this:
> There is a distinction between the terms we define in the ontology, 
and the terms that we use in the model. This documentation should 
cover both, and the ontology would only cover our own.
> The result would still need to be respec'd to ensure presentation 
and process consistency.
> It separates concerns of publication of spec documents from 
publication of technical artifacts such as ontologies. Editors 
(present and future) should not be required to write OWL to update the
 specification, the OWL should be derived from that specification.
> Given the above, it's unclear that there would be significant 
savings, nor that the result would be more readable than what we have 
This decision is entirely under the control of the editors. If you are
 fine with it, I am fine with it!

GitHub Notif of comment by iherman
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:15:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC