- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 22:15:22 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 4 Nov 2015, at 04:42, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > The proposal at TPAC was to auto-generate the documentation using the ontology plus a tool like LODE <http://www.essepuntato.it/lode>. There are several issues with this: > > There is a distinction between the terms we define in the ontology, and the terms that we use in the model. This documentation should cover both, and the ontology would only cover our own. > The result would still need to be respec'd to ensure presentation and process consistency. > It separates concerns of publication of spec documents from publication of technical artifacts such as ontologies. Editors (present and future) should not be required to write OWL to update the specification, the OWL should be derived from that specification. > Given the above, it's unclear that there would be significant savings, nor that the result would be more readable than what we have today. This decision is entirely under the control of the editors. If you are fine with it, I am fine with it! -- GitHub Notif of comment by iherman See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/97#issuecomment-153506439
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:15:25 UTC