W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Dropping type from ... what?

From: Takeshi Kanai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 02:47:18 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-135617537-1440730037-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I'm afraid I'm missing something, but in my understanding, both body 
and target just provide IDs (URI, Uniform Resource Identifier). 
Sometimes it could be ISBN, ("urn:isbn:4-8399-0454-5 for example). If 
it is needed to point to remote resource location in body, I think it 
would be much better to use another property and set the location, for
 instance url as Youtube did, instead of using ID. And then MIME type 
or any other resource information should be set as a part of resource 
There are some cases that resource data, or information, would be 
stored in the same graph database, id property is still useful to 
identify the resource data node.

GitHub Notif of comment by tkanai
Received on Friday, 28 August 2015 02:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:39 UTC