Re: Roles Proposals

> On 24 Aug 2015, at 24:26 , Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Following from the discussions of the past couple of months, we have arrived at a concrete proposal for allowing roles / motivations to be associated with bodies.
> 
> The proposal is documented here:
>     http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd/roles.html
> 
> It has two major sections:
> 
> * Section 3.1 documents the changes that we believe there is consensus around at this stage.
> 
> We will issue a more formal Call for Consensus regarding this section momentarily. Please respond in the thread-to-come regarding this entire section.
> The CFC will be open until Tuesday September 1st.
> 
> * Section 3.2 documents additional changes that have arisen.
> 
> Please respond in this thread with reactions to _each_ of the subsections, 3.2.1 through 3.2.5.  As a guideline, if you support the idea just give a +1.  If you don't, please explain why. This isn't a call for consensus, just a straw poll to see which areas need further discussion.
> 
> Straw Poll for Support:
> 
> * 3.2.1 Require the use of SpecificResource for Bodies

+1

> 
> * 3.2.2 Require the use of SpecificResource for Targets
> 

+1

> * 3.2.3 Allow hasRole on new EmbeddedTextualBody class

+1

> 
> * 3.2.4 Rename hasSource to hasContent

0

> 
> * 3.2.5 Remove motivatedBy completely, rename Motivation to Role

+1

Ivan
> 
> 
> Many thanks!
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 06:56:08 UTC