Re: limitations of classification systems, fiction, lack of ontological commitment

I had to write this in a separate communication, just to make sure all 
things are clear, and that we all read the same emails.

*Paola’s note saying K3D has “no relation to this CG” just doesn’t match 
the public record. *

Dave, Milton, Tyson and I have all documented how K3D nodes, Reality 
Enabler, and MVCIC align directly with the scope laid out in the CG’s 
own wiki and mailing-list threads.

Furthermore, I've read Quine’s “On What There Is” before referencing it 
(differently from people that judge before reading); his emphasis on 
resolving “disagreement over cases” is exactly why K3D’s Houses/Galaxies 
enforce explicit domains of discourse.

All vocabulary translations we’ve shared are linked in the list archives 
for traceability.

I'd appreciate future scope decisions being based on the actual 
contributions already logged.


Sincerely yours,

Daniel