- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:38:19 -0500
- To: public-aikr@w3.org
On 12/3/25 10:33, Daniel Campos Ramos wrote: > I had to write this in a separate communication, just to make sure all > things are clear, and that we all read the same emails. > > *Paola’s note saying K3D has “no relation to this CG” just doesn’t match > the public record. * FYI, I did not interpret Paola's statement to imply in any way that your work is outside the scope of the CG's domain of interest. It certainly appears to me to be within the scope of interest of the CG. I understood Paola's concern to be merely to make sure that users of your repo do not *mistake* your repo for an official CG work product that is owned/operated by W3C. Specifically, *you* own the work in your repo and *you* are responsible for its content -- not this W3C group. Thanks, David Booth > > Dave, Milton, Tyson and I have all documented how K3D nodes, Reality > Enabler, and MVCIC align directly with the scope laid out in the CG’s > own wiki and mailing-list threads. > > Furthermore, I've read Quine’s “On What There Is” before referencing it > (differently from people that judge before reading); his emphasis on > resolving “disagreement over cases” is exactly why K3D’s Houses/Galaxies > enforce explicit domains of discourse. > > All vocabulary translations we’ve shared are linked in the list archives > for traceability. > > I'd appreciate future scope decisions being based on the actual > contributions already logged. > > > Sincerely yours, > > Daniel >
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2025 18:38:24 UTC