Re: limitations of classification systems, fiction, lack of ontological commitment

Hi Paola, thanks for the reminder.

Just to clarify:

  * The NotebookLM is my personal study notebook ("I’ve been
    maintaining..."), not an official CG tool. I labeled it “W3C AI KR
    CG” simply so participants (like Charles) can find the same
    references you cite. I’ve added a disclaimer making that explicit
    since the first time I collaborated with this resource.

  * Every item links back to the original source (wiki, PDFs, GitHub),
    and you’ve had full editor access since the day I created it. If
    anything needs correcting or updating, feel free to edit directly.

  * In the K3D repo (MVCIC, KR specs, etc.) I always include links and
    author attribution not only for AI KR CG sources. If something looks
    missing, point me to it and I’ll adjust right away (If you have time
    to at least read a word I contribute - witch you never did so far
    and publicly admitting you can't even understand the things I talk
    about).

  * *The intention isn’t to duplicate CG resources or spin up separate
    CGs* on the same subject—in fact, *that would go against the usual
    W3C guidance* you’ve mentioned. *The NotebookLM is just *there *to
    help newcomers navigate the references you cite (Quine, ontology
    diagrams, etc.)* without having to wade through long threads. It’s a
    study aid, not a replacement.

If you’d like any additional disclaimers or a specific label, let me 
know. I’m committed to keeping everything open, traceable, and properly 
attributed, all public and open (no gatekeeping in any sense).

Hope this clarifies things; I know it can be hard to meet every 
expectation.,

Daniel