Re: limitations of classification systems, fiction, lack of ontological commitment

Daniel
Thank you for sharing your repo with participants

To name an external repo after the AI KR CG may not be a good idea.
I myself use different tools but do not know if there is a version history
and if it is auditable etc

Participants contribute here under a CLA agreement that gives permission to
reuse under under attributon
CG tools log every single entry, from wiki to posts on the list, so it is
easy to check history
When content developed in the CG is copied and pasted onto other
repos,where other authors may contribute under different license agreement
it is possible to lose track of provenance and traceability
and the content may become outdated.

Please make sure your personal repo, if it uses or references the CG,
bears the correct label where the relation between you as a participant and
the CG itself is correctly represented a
Something like* 'this repo is not part of the CG  tools and its content may
not  represent  the content of the work being done in the CG*

Participants use/draw resources from  the AI KR CG and related discussions
, but they do not own the resource itself

So for example, if you plan to use one of my diagrams in your notebook,
*which I may not have time to check,  make sure it is correctly represented
and attributed to the source *with a link to where you took it from

If in the future I update the diagram, and for whatever reason you may not
update the version on your notebook
this would result in an inconsistency, unless there is a link pointing to
the CG resources for a complete and up to date version
of any material used in this notebook,

 Kindly make sure that   any materials taken directly from the CG,
including its name,  discussions, resources, diagrams, points of view
etc  are properly attributed to the respective authors and bear the correct
attribution and label *that are taken from the CG, author name, with a link
to the source.

There is no relation between your architecture and this CG at this time,
other than you being a  participant of this CG.
Participants make their contributions cannot monitor external resources to
make sure authorship and contributions are represented and maintained
correctly

Sorry to appear tedious, but things have gone wrong before

Thank you for respecting everyone's authorship

Best

PDM






On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 8:02 PM Daniel Campos Ramos <
danielcamposramos.68@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Charles,
>
> If it helps your exploration, I’ve been maintaining a shared NotebookLM
> (“W3C Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation Community Group”)
> that pulls together the references, KR diagrams, Quine excerpts, etc. we’ve
> been discussing. You can browse and search it here:
>
> https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/80d00386-4b7d-4893-ae84-1c5f90c223de
>
> I’ve also documented our own KR artifacts and methodologies in the
> Knowledge3D repo—particularly the MVCIC (Multi-Vibe Code In Chain)
> workflow, which is how we structure and audit multi-agent reasoning. Full
> path:
>
>
> https://github.com/danielcamposramos/Knowledge3D/tree/main/docs/multi_vibe_orchestration
>
> Feel free to take a look, and happy to chat if you have questions.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>