Re: Decisions ?: Towards a Standard model of the mind

I would welcome any comment..

We might set a goal of having agreement ..
 Thus our  target use-case is  'a community decision'

Carl

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 1:53 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cart, what  response would you like us to formulate?
>
> Milton, regarding plagiarism, to give credit to ideas/discussions picked
> up on mailing list is
> a courtesy
> Researchers normally cite only published sources (that is, the excuse for
> not
> giving attribution is that a discussion is not a formal citable source)
>
> This is why I publish short papers summarizing the novelty points
> so that they are citable sources
>
> However, they are plagiarised anyway, because dishonesty is engrained in
> the academic system./
> In many cases the mopre dishonest researchers are, the more rewarded with
> careers advancements
>
> Whistleblowers by contrast, those who denounce the plagiarism and
> malpractice, are systematically discredited and locked out of professional
> opportunities
>
> In many cases, real plagiarism, where the ideas discussed in posts are
> also  published
> as formal peer reviewed  scholarly publications with DOIs and then
> plagiarized (reworded, and maybe with an element of novelty added by the
> plagiarist for good measure)
> This is research malpractice
> Unfortunately, it is widespread
>
> I do not think W3C can do anything about it, other than offering the
> facility to publish
> reports with URLs
>
> Aw, I can hear at the back of my head Owen suggesting that stratML can be
> used to
> assert the prior art of any ideas if published using stratML. Maybe so.
>
> The problem is that enforcing the plagiarism complaints requires enourmous
> amount of resources and time - we are busy trying to get the novelty
> written up and accepted
>
> So, lets try to update and advance our agendas anyway, whatever the cost
>
> P
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:37 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings
>>
>> I think we can all agree that Decisions are something that Humans and all
>> form of Automatons are expected to use.
>>
>> I would welcome thoughts on the KR that best  facilitates Decisions.
>>
>> Decision Tree
>> Decision Table
>> Decision Model
>> Decision Knowledge Graph
>> Decision..other
>>
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>> Carlmattocks@wellnessintelligence.institute
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022, 12:24 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
>> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some interesting articles and links:
>>>
>>> A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework
>>> across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and
>>> Robotics
>>> https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744
>>>
>>> https://ojs.library.carleton.ca/index.php/cmcb/index
>>>
>>>
>>> https://theconversation.com/cross-pollination-among-neuroscience-psychology-and-ai-research-yields-a-foundational-understanding-of-thinking-162412
>>> <https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is missing is knowledge representation and formal systems that can
>>> be used for modeling that factor in perception, networks of interacting
>>> processes, and quantum processes in neural network activity.
>>>
>>> The convergence of quantum computing and AI will require we take a hard
>>> look at how to reconcile quantum biology, computational biology,
>>> neuroscience, cognitive science, formal modeling and knowledge
>>> representation.
>>>
>>> Milton Ponson
>>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
>>> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>>
>>