Re: Decisions ?: Towards a Standard model of the mind

While I do not claim to have a solution to plagiarism, yes, I do believe 
that documenting one's plans on the Web in open, standard, 
machine-readable format is one way of staking claim to them.

Moreover, to the degree that others are engaging in bad or ineffective 
behavior, I also believe it could be helpful to publish the evidence of 
such behavior as a "performance report" in such a format.

See https://aboutthem.info/ and particularly:

    Goal 2: Second-Party Information
    <https://aboutthem.info/ATI.xml#_681307e4-ba9e-11e8-bf2c-68a0f9f4b879>
    - Enable second-party individuals and organizations to document and
    share useful information about others that is supported by
    verifiable evidence.

    Goal 3: Third-Party Services
    <https://aboutthem.info/ATI.xml#_8290b252-bb6a-11e8-96bd-5716bf55896c>
    - Encourage value-added intermediaries to provide services
    leveraging About Me, About Us, and About Them information published
    on the Web in StratML format.

Making it as easy and useful as possible to document and share 
performance plans and reports on the Web is my quest.

BTW, I take it as a backhanded compliment that I've placed ideas in the 
back of people's heads.  However, I don't care so much about the ideas 
as I do the actions and the results they beget... and I believe the 
desired results are more likely to be realized if they are documented 
and shared with key stakeholders in the form of a clearly specified and 
agreed upon plan.

As Yogi Berra said 
<https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/23616-if-you-don-t-know-where-you-are-going-you-ll-end#:~:text=you'll%20end%20up%20someplace%20else.%E2%80%9D>, 
"If you don't know where you're going, you'll end up somewhere else."  
Or perhaps nowhere at all.

Owen


On 8/3/2022 2:24 AM, carl mattocks wrote:
> I would welcome any comment..
>
> We might set a goal of having agreement ..
>  Thus our  target use-case is  'a community decision'
>
> Carl
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 1:53 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Cart, what  response would you like us to formulate?
>
>     Milton, regarding plagiarism, to give credit to ideas/discussions
>     picked up on mailing list is
>     a courtesy
>     Researchers normally cite only published sources (that is, the
>     excuse for not
>     giving attribution is that a discussion is not a formal citable
>     source)
>
>     This is why I publish short papers summarizing the novelty points
>     so that they are citable sources
>
>     However, they are plagiarised anyway, because dishonesty is
>     engrained in the academic system./
>     In many cases the mopre dishonest researchers are, the more
>     rewarded with careers advancements
>
>     Whistleblowers by contrast, those who denounce the plagiarism and
>     malpractice, are systematically discredited and locked out of
>     professional opportunities
>
>     In many cases, real plagiarism, where the ideas discussed in posts
>     are  also  published
>     as formal peer reviewed  scholarly publications with DOIs and then
>     plagiarized (reworded, and maybe with an element of novelty added
>     by the plagiarist for good measure)
>     This is research malpractice
>     Unfortunately, it is widespread
>
>     I do not think W3C can do anything about it, other than offering
>     the facility to publish
>     reports with URLs
>
>     Aw, I can hear at the back of my head Owen suggesting that stratML
>     can be used to
>     assert the prior art of any ideas if published using stratML.
>     Maybe so.
>
>     The problem is that enforcing the plagiarism complaints requires
>     enourmous amount of resources and time - we are busy trying to get
>     the novelty written up and accepted
>     So, lets try to update and advance our agendas anyway, whatever
>     the cost
>
>     P
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:37 AM carl mattocks
>     <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         Greetings
>
>         I think we can all agree that Decisions are something that
>         Humans and all form of Automatons are expected to use.
>
>         I would welcome thoughts on the KR that best  facilitates
>         Decisions.
>
>         Decision Tree
>         Decision Table
>         Decision Model
>         Decision Knowledge Graph
>         Decision..other
>
>         Carl Mattocks
>
>         Carlmattocks@wellnessintelligence.institute
>
>         On Sat, Jul 30, 2022, 12:24 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
>         <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>             Some interesting articles and links:
>
>
>               A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common
>               Computational Framework across Artificial Intelligence,
>               Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics
>
>             https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744

>
>             https://ojs.library.carleton.ca/index.php/cmcb/index
>
>             https://theconversation.com/cross-pollination-among-neuroscience-psychology-and-ai-research-yields-a-foundational-understanding-of-thinking-162412

>
>
>             What is missing is knowledge representation and formal
>             systems that can be used for modeling that factor in
>             perception, networks of interacting processes, and quantum
>             processes in neural network activity.
>
>             The convergence of quantum computing and AI will require
>             we take a hard look at how to reconcile quantum biology,
>             computational biology, neuroscience, cognitive science,
>             formal modeling and knowledge representation.
>
>             Milton Ponson
>             GSM: +297 747 8280
>             PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>             Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>             Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable
>             development to all stakeholders worldwide through
>             collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced
>             modeling, software and standards development
>