- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:48:51 +1000
- To: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2XvE0pGbaNu+y9k+Cf9Ai-eooJQxkw+BH5+eKN7qMHOg@mail.gmail.com>
The problem ATM with https://www.webizen.net.au/about/executive-summary/preserving-the-freedom-to-think/ is that the implication becomes a circumstance where discovery - technically - needs to be decentralised. https://medium.com/webcivics/a-future-knowledge-age-2e3f5095c67 https://medium.com/webcivics/knowledge-clouds-f3f5ef1990d9 https://medium.com/webcivics/permissioned-commons-7fc33a1ce23e https://medium.com/webcivics/tech-for-permissive-commons-c0961b77249e high stakes stuff... imo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYPjXz1MVv0&list=PLCbmz0VSZ_voTpRK9-o5RksERak4kOL40&index=5 I'm not sure what the priority is from a US policy point of view, atm... Timothy Holborn. On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 16:25, carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: > I would welcome any comment.. > > We might set a goal of having agreement .. > Thus our target use-case is 'a community decision' > > Carl > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022, 1:53 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Cart, what response would you like us to formulate? >> >> Milton, regarding plagiarism, to give credit to ideas/discussions picked >> up on mailing list is >> a courtesy >> Researchers normally cite only published sources (that is, the excuse for >> not >> giving attribution is that a discussion is not a formal citable source) >> >> This is why I publish short papers summarizing the novelty points >> so that they are citable sources >> >> However, they are plagiarised anyway, because dishonesty is engrained in >> the academic system./ >> In many cases the mopre dishonest researchers are, the more rewarded with >> careers advancements >> >> Whistleblowers by contrast, those who denounce the plagiarism and >> malpractice, are systematically discredited and locked out of professional >> opportunities >> >> In many cases, real plagiarism, where the ideas discussed in posts are >> also published >> as formal peer reviewed scholarly publications with DOIs and then >> plagiarized (reworded, and maybe with an element of novelty added by the >> plagiarist for good measure) >> This is research malpractice >> Unfortunately, it is widespread >> >> I do not think W3C can do anything about it, other than offering the >> facility to publish >> reports with URLs >> >> Aw, I can hear at the back of my head Owen suggesting that stratML can be >> used to >> assert the prior art of any ideas if published using stratML. Maybe so. >> >> The problem is that enforcing the plagiarism complaints requires >> enourmous amount of resources and time - we are busy trying to get the >> novelty written up and accepted >> >> So, lets try to update and advance our agendas anyway, whatever the cost >> >> P >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:37 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings >>> >>> I think we can all agree that Decisions are something that Humans and >>> all form of Automatons are expected to use. >>> >>> I would welcome thoughts on the KR that best facilitates Decisions. >>> >>> Decision Tree >>> Decision Table >>> Decision Model >>> Decision Knowledge Graph >>> Decision..other >>> >>> Carl Mattocks >>> >>> Carlmattocks@wellnessintelligence.institute >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022, 12:24 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < >>> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Some interesting articles and links: >>>> >>>> A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework >>>> across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and >>>> Robotics >>>> https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744 >>>> >>>> https://ojs.library.carleton.ca/index.php/cmcb/index >>>> >>>> >>>> https://theconversation.com/cross-pollination-among-neuroscience-psychology-and-ai-research-yields-a-foundational-understanding-of-thinking-162412 >>>> <https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744> >>>> >>>> >>>> What is missing is knowledge representation and formal systems that can >>>> be used for modeling that factor in perception, networks of interacting >>>> processes, and quantum processes in neural network activity. >>>> >>>> The convergence of quantum computing and AI will require we take a hard >>>> look at how to reconcile quantum biology, computational biology, >>>> neuroscience, cognitive science, formal modeling and knowledge >>>> representation. >>>> >>>> Milton Ponson >>>> GSM: +297 747 8280 >>>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad >>>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean >>>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development >>>> to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied >>>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development >>>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2022 06:49:40 UTC