- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:33:45 +0800
- To: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SpM+Nuzwe2vzH34gG=XsY=mZcTbYKrBfWnwYcYrpGvs4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Amirouche here is they key point: machine learning is opaque, through symbolic explicit shared KR the logic behind ML can be made explicit/transparent/accountable It is only through symbolic KR that the logical integrity of complex systems can be made patent and monitored throughout the lifecycle PDM On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:42 AM Amirouche Boubekki < amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> wrote: > Toward understanding better the goal of the group, I am trying to > understand what would be the applications that one could build upon > AIKR future drafts. > > It is still not clear to me what a specification regarding Knowledge > Representation could look like. > > The simple goal that I read often about AI is something along those lines: > > > Make computers do what humans do > > or > > > Enable human level of cognition in computers > > The first thing those goals fail to recognize is that machines are > already better than humans regarding some tasks. More generally, I > think it is easier to think in terms of Intelligence Augmentation: > > How the machine can help humans perform better at intellectual tasks? > > Hence, the question: > > What area of human endeavor can still be improved using computers? > > I fail to think outside-the-box, so I will fall back to my own needs: > > I need computers to help me acquire new knowledge. > > That is, I want the computer to help me learn new things. Simply, I > want a computer-teacher. > > Questions: > > 1) What intellectual task do you think computers should help you with? > > 2) What will be applications of AI KR specifications? > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2020 00:34:34 UTC