- From: Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:15:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: "paoladimaio10" <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- CC: "Owen Ambur" <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, "W3C AIKR CG" <public-aikr@w3.org>, "Pradeep Jain" <Pradeep.Jain@ictect.com>
I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now. I am happy to contribute and help with delivery. -Ronald P. Reck On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot Owen > > are you local to DC? > > I think we just need to send the abstract asap > then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and > language > > KR is the way we can hold government guys accountable, we just need to > make > a compelling case for them. > > Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and > hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully > others of course, > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > > > Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and > > accountability in government. While this May 1998 presentation makes no > > reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is > > all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard, > > machine-readable format: http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html > > > > As revealed by this Google query > > <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>, > > AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of > > records. > > > > For background on machine-readability, see > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document > > > > See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act > > (OGDA): > > https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/ > > > > Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI: > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml > > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml > > > > It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project > > Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>. Here are some of > > the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML > > format: http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM > > > > I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation > > of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the > > advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government > > at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington, > > Virginia, on September 28 - 30. > > > > For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is > > available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml > > In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known: > > http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC > > > > Owen > > > > On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > > > > Greetings folks > > > > There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO > > conference in DC > > > > I would like to attend in person, if possible, and maybe that could be an > > opportunity to hangout > > together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important > > (and so much in need of guidance) > > or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present > > > > Here is more or les what I have in mind, > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing > > > > if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch > > I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say > > (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on > > this list > > may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak > > different languages) > > I guess thats part of the mission > > > > I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission > > statements > > to proceed with their nominations > > > > Thanks > > > > PDM > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 20 December 2019 18:15:34 UTC