AI can do Better with KR: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contribution

Paola et al:

Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR ..Wellness (fit for
purpose score) Indicator derived from Explain effective change in state
(unfreezing, changing and refreezing) actuated by Registered Agent (using
COI Formulated & Proven AIKR ) employing Container Content (Blockchain &
Registry-Repository Objects IDs)


enjoy

Carl Mattocks

Wellness Intelligence . Institute
It was a pleasure to clarify


On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton'
> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - including a
> link/url to any fuller resources
> you want to be included.
> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you make,
> especially the less obvious one?
> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to relay it
> in the talk
> P
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :}
>>
>> enjoy
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>>
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Excellent Title for one or more slides
>>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding
>>>
>>> Carl Mattocks
>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for Results"
>>>> and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>>>>
>>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
>>>> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
>>>> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
>>>> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>>>>
>>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
>>>> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
>>>> to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>>>>
>>>> Owen
>>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>
>>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good
>>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>>>>
>>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and
>>>> paper as pointers to this work
>>>>
>>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we have
>>>> one week or so -
>>>>
>>>>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you could
>>>> edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple sentence
>>>> for each point
>>>>
>>>> - what is machine readability
>>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other benefits
>>>> vs other options
>>>> (with link to stratml.org)
>>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>>>>
>>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
>>>> thank you
>>>>
>>>> P
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>>>>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>>>>
>>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML
>>>>> for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by
>>>>> the Wikipedia police:
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that
>>>>> many others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event
>>>>> they may wish to take up that cause.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.
>>>>> That's human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold
>>>>> ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power
>>>>> to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are
>>>>> willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability
>>>>> means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own
>>>>> biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance
>>>>> metrics, readily available to stakeholders.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
>>>>> StratML.
>>>>>
>>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at
>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that
>>>>> opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>>>>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>>>>
>>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>>>>
>>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format
>>>>> at http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>>>>
>>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>>>>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>>>>> |
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>>>>
>>>>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>>>>
>>>>> Owen
>>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what
>>>>> they say or do, especially when
>>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>>>>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
>>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>>>>
>>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments :-)
>>>>> if you want to create
>>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet
>>>>> points also its relation to KR
>>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
>>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> PDM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance" would
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> such documents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard, machine-readable
>>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder collaboration
>>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>>>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming
>>>>>> audience
>>>>>> > doesn know)
>>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>>>>> > challenges and solutions
>>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a
>>>>>> paragraph
>>>>>> > or two
>>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>>>>>> > fill out a few bits
>>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions must
>>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>