Re: AI can do Better with KR: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contribution

Thank you Carl and all

i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted.
care to unpack it a bit more:?  re the slides something telegraphic *but
hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the paper, I may need to
articulate some sentence in narrative form

is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or that you
want to do?
a couple more questions below

>
> Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR ..
>


> Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator
>
OF WHAT?


> derived from Explain effective change in state (unfreezing, changing and refreezing)
>
>
WHAT CHANGE?


> actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & Proven AIKR )
>
UHM  COI, COI. COI  - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for what
purpose


> employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository Objects IDs)
>
UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK?




>
> enjoy
>
> Carl Mattocks
>
> Wellness Intelligence . Institute
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton'
>> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - including
>> a link/url to any fuller resources
>> you want to be included.
>> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you make,
>> especially the less obvious one?
>> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to relay it
>> in the talk
>> P
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :}
>>>
>>> enjoy
>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>
>>>
>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Excellent Title for one or more slides
>>>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding
>>>>
>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for
>>>>> Results" and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
>>>>> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
>>>>> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
>>>>> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
>>>>> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
>>>>> to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>>>>>
>>>>> Owen
>>>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>
>>>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good
>>>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>>>>>
>>>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and
>>>>> paper as pointers to this work
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we have
>>>>> one week or so -
>>>>>
>>>>>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you
>>>>> could  edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple
>>>>> sentence for each point
>>>>>
>>>>> - what is machine readability
>>>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other benefits
>>>>> vs other options
>>>>> (with link to stratml.org)
>>>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>>>>>
>>>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
>>>>> thank you
>>>>>
>>>>> P
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>>>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>>>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>>>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>>>>>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML
>>>>>> for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by
>>>>>> the Wikipedia police:
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that
>>>>>> many others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event
>>>>>> they may wish to take up that cause.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.
>>>>>> That's human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold
>>>>>> ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power
>>>>>> to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are
>>>>>> willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability
>>>>>> means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own
>>>>>> biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance
>>>>>> metrics, readily available to stakeholders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
>>>>>> StratML.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at
>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that
>>>>>> opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>>>>>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format
>>>>>> at http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>>>>>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>>>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>>>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>>>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>>>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>>>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what
>>>>>> they say or do, especially when
>>>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>>>>>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>>>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
>>>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments
>>>>>> :-) if you want to create
>>>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet
>>>>>> points also its relation to KR
>>>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
>>>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> PDM
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>>>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance"
>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> such documents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>>>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard,
>>>>>>> machine-readable
>>>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder
>>>>>>> collaboration
>>>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>>>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>>>>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming
>>>>>>> audience
>>>>>>> > doesn know)
>>>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>>>>>> > challenges and solutions
>>>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a
>>>>>>> paragraph
>>>>>>> > or two
>>>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>>>>>>> > fill out a few bits
>>>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>