Re: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contributions?

Thank you Carl Owen and Milton'
I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - including a
link/url to any fuller resources
you want to be included.
Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you make,
especially the less obvious one?
I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to relay it
in the talk
P



On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :}
>
> enjoy
> Carl Mattocks
>
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Excellent Title for one or more slides
>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding
>>
>> Carl Mattocks
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for Results"
>>> and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>>>
>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
>>> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
>>> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
>>> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>>>
>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
>>> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
>>> to do so.
>>>
>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>>>
>>> Owen
>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Owen
>>>
>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good
>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>>>
>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and
>>> paper as pointers to this work
>>>
>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we have
>>> one week or so -
>>>
>>>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you could
>>> edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple sentence
>>> for each point
>>>
>>> - what is machine readability
>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other benefits
>>> vs other options
>>> (with link to stratml.org)
>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>>>
>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
>>> thank you
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>>>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>>>
>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML
>>>> for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by
>>>> the Wikipedia police:
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that
>>>> many others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event
>>>> they may wish to take up that cause.
>>>>
>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.
>>>> That's human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold
>>>> ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power
>>>> to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are
>>>> willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability
>>>> means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own
>>>> biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance
>>>> metrics, readily available to stakeholders.
>>>>
>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
>>>> StratML.
>>>>
>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at
>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that
>>>> opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>>>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>>>
>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>>>
>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format
>>>> at http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>>>
>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>>>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>>>> |
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>>>
>>>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>>>
>>>> Owen
>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what
>>>> they say or do, especially when
>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>>>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>>>
>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>>>
>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments :-)
>>>> if you want to create
>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet
>>>> points also its relation to KR
>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> PDM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance" would
>>>>> be
>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>>>>> public
>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>>>
>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets of
>>>>> such documents.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard, machine-readable
>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder collaboration
>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>>>
>>>>> Owen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>>>> >
>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming audience
>>>>> > doesn know)
>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>>>> > challenges and solutions
>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a paragraph
>>>>> > or two
>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>>>>> > fill out a few bits
>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>>>> >
>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions must
>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>>>
>>>>>