Re: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contributions?

Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at 
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2 
However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR 
audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the 
attached four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or 
different.

This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML for 
the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by 
the Wikipedia police: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be

I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that many 
others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event they 
may wish to take up that cause.

It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable. That's 
human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold ourselves 
and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power to hold 
public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are willing 
"man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability means 
more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own 
biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified 
performance metrics, readily available to stakeholders.

In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like 
StratML.

President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at 
http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that 
opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his 
administration's performance against those objectives.

Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at 
http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama

A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format at 
http://ambur.net/#Candidates

The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like 
politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same, 
self-serving #GOFPAU 
<https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D> 
and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon 
others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense 
of enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the 
past, thus dooming future generations to re-living it. 
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/ 
| https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/

If that's the case, shame on us.

Owen

On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> Thank you Owen
> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what 
> they say or do, especially when
> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political 
> underworld to ensure discord) really
> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>
> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>
> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments :-) 
> if you want to create
> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet 
> points also its relation to KR
> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>
> Thanks
> PDM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net 
> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote:
>
>     Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>     perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance"
>     would be
>     incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>     public
>     records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>     https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>
>     E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important
>     sets of
>     such documents.
>     https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>
>     BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>     published as performance plans in an open, standard, machine-readable
>     format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>     value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder collaboration
>     before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>
>     In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>     collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>     http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>
>     Owen
>
>     On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>     > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>     >
>     > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>     > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>     >
>     > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>     > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming
>     audience
>     > doesn know)
>     > relevance to E-Governance
>     > challenges and solutions
>     > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>     >
>     > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a
>     paragraph
>     > or two
>     > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>     > fill out a few bits
>     > and of course be credited accordingly
>     >
>     > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions must
>     > reach me before Aug 30
>     > so that I can edit them into the draft
>     >
>     > Thanks, best regards
>