- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:43:39 +0800
- To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Cc: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, "public-aikr@w3.org" <public-aikr@w3.org>
Milton we must accept 'designed by human' unless you can please share info of AI not designed by human (other than some experimental neural networks that modify themselves ) https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/7gl635/is_selfmodifying_code_the_best_option_for/ (this may become the case in the future but not yet in the present afaik) On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 12:04 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Excellent starting point. But again I object to the "Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to systems designed by humans that, ..... > > It stresses anthropocentric thinking. This may sound crazy. But if we model the Reasoning part based on humans we will run into problems. > > This I will elaborate upon in a proposition paper that defines categories of uses of AI and the types of entities that are interacting. > > Nevertheless a good starting point. Now let us find similar documents from UNESCO, UN and professional organizations and standard setting organizations as well. > > regards > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Friday, December 21, 2018 7:05 AM, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: > > > Hi, > you may want to refer to the much more solid document (and the map therein) produced on the 18th of December 2018 by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: "A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines": > https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines > > cheers > --e. > > On 17 Dec 2018, at 08:29, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Enrico > > nice to hear from you- > thanks for reply > > Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map > How to go about it? > > I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading > to complete it > this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but > not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough- > > What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what > we started here > > we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say > the representation in the article is wrong > we should definitely try to point it out > > PDM > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: > > > On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > if people think this is good enough > > > It is as bad as I can imagine. > The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts. > What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes? > I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one. > cheers > --e. > > > >
Received on Saturday, 22 December 2018 03:44:37 UTC