Re: designed by human

All AI we know is designed by humans. I am not disputing this. But I am questioning whether the AI we design should only be for engaging other humans, and not other species on earth.
And with the current development in space exploration AI and robots we design must be able to do other things than just engage humans and be able to self-modify.
I do agree with the general consensus. I will however also try to show future paths for AI.
It is not as far-fetched as you may think or science fiction.
But to put everyone at ease my generalized viewpoint I do not want to impose as the guiding principle.
I concur with AI designed by humans for this CG. Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Friday, December 21, 2018 11:44 PM, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 Milton

we must accept 'designed by human'
unless you can please share info of AI not designed by human
(other than some experimental neural networks that modify themselves
)
https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/7gl635/is_selfmodifying_code_the_best_option_for/


(this may become the case in the future but not yet in the present afaik)

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 12:04 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program
<metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Excellent starting point. But again I object to the "Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to systems designed by humans that,  .....
>
> It stresses anthropocentric thinking. This may sound crazy. But if we model the Reasoning part based on humans we will run into problems.
>
> This I will elaborate upon in a proposition paper that defines categories of uses of AI and the types of entities that are interacting.
>
> Nevertheless a good starting point. Now let us find similar documents from UNESCO, UN and professional organizations and standard setting organizations as well.
>
> regards
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2018 7:05 AM, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> you may want to refer to the much more solid document (and the map therein) produced on the 18th of December 2018 by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: "A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines":
> https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines
>
> cheers
> --e.
>
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 08:29, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Enrico
>
> nice to hear from you-
> thanks for reply
>
> Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map
> How to go about it?
>
> I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading
> to complete it
> this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but
> not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough-
>
> What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what
> we started here
>
> we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say
> the representation in the article is wrong
> we should definitely try to point it out
>
> PDM
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> if people think this is good enough
>
>
> It is as bad as I can imagine.
> The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts.
> What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes?
> I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one.
> cheers
> --e.
>
>
>
>