Re: welcome new members and AI map

Busy with this map. Not easy to piece together. Using three angles: (1) established/proposed/developing standards for AI and KR, (2) accepted and utilized technologies in industry and research and textbook literature, (3) proposed new avenues for development from industry experts.
regards Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Monday, December 17, 2018 9:40 AM, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 Dear Enrico

nice to hear from you-
thanks for reply

Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map
How to go about it?

I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading
to complete it
this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the domain, but
not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough-

What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what
we started here

we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say
the representation in the article is wrong
we should definitely try to point it out

PDM

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
>
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> if people think this is good enough
>
>
> It is as bad as I can imagine.
> The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack all the relevant parts.
> What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on Forbes?
> I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one.
> cheers
> --e.