Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7744)

This should be 5.6.3, not .4 or 5.5.


> On 31 Dec 2023, at 8:52 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9112,
> "HTTP/1.1".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7744
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: sequpt <sequpt@protonmail.com>
> 
> Section: 1.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> obs-text      = <obs-text, see [HTTP], Section 5.6.4>
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> obs-text      = <obs-text, see [HTTP], Section 5.5>
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 'obs-text' is used in the rules defined in 5.6.4 but is only defined in 5.5.
> This error also appears in 'Appendix A. Collected ABNF'
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9112 (draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : HTTP/1.1
> Publication Date    : June 2022
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : HTTP
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Sunday, 31 December 2023 09:59:03 UTC