- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:22:22 +0100
- To: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
- Cc: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 6 Nov 2023, at 1:57 pm, Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> wrote: > > Hmm. I just double checked RFC9110#9.3.6. I had thought the switch-to-destination happened immediately after the status 200, but I had remembered wrong. The switch is "immediately after the response header section". So you're right. Headers are unambiguously from the proxy server. Correct. We could have been a bit more precise about this, but it's unambiguous that the response headers are _not_ from the target. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2023 12:22:33 UTC