- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:58:11 +0000
- To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- cc: Stefan Eissing <stefan@eissing.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Glenn Strauss <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- Kazuho Oku writes: > But honestly, I do not have an appetite to implement such an extension at the > moment, as I already have, and am required to have safeguards for vanilla H2. > As much as I like discussing about how better we can do by defining protocol > extensions, I kind of wonder if there is any H2 developer interested in > implementing the extension. -1 from here. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 13 October 2023 11:58:18 UTC