Re: URL, URI and the w3c from Daniel Stenberg on 2022-06-14 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2022)

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 23:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
cc: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Giuseppe De Marco <giuseppe.demarco@teamdigitale.governo.it>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <895n295o-175q-ppn7-1472-p4np728p70o1@unkk.fr>

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022, Tim Bray wrote:

> I think it’s the case that browsers will accept any 3986-conforming URI
> that is within its abilities, i.e. http:, https: (and maybe ftp, etc?).

No, sorry, that's not true. The browsers accept and work with the WHATWG URL 
spec style of URLs and they are incompatible with 3986-conforming URIs (and 
3987 IRIs) in numerous ways. As I've explained.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2022 21:33:27 UTC