- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 04:53:16 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 13/08/2016 3:08 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-08-12 09:03, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> On 12/08/2016 6:42 p.m., Martin Thomson wrote: >>> On 11 August 2016 at 14:52, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>> Thoughts (here or there)? >>> >>> I thought that the direction of the discussion was promising. A >>> bespoke format, though more work, is entirely justified in this case. >> >> Ditto. I was okay with JSON only for the short period where the Draft >> was speaking of it as the format for use in RFCs (as replacement for >> ABNF) not on-wire format for delivery. > > It never did that. > Well the text in the pre- ietf'96 Draft certainly fooled me. Amos
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 16:53:59 UTC