Re: #225: JFV Revisited

On 2016-08-12 09:03, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 6:42 p.m., Martin Thomson wrote:
>> On 11 August 2016 at 14:52, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>> Thoughts (here or there)?
>>
>> I thought that the direction of the discussion was promising.  A
>> bespoke format, though more work, is entirely justified in this case.
>
> Ditto. I was okay with JSON only for the short period where the Draft
> was speaking of it as the format for use in RFCs (as replacement for
> ABNF) not on-wire format for delivery.

It never did that.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 15:08:38 UTC