- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:03:11 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 12/08/2016 6:42 p.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 11 August 2016 at 14:52, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> Thoughts (here or there)? > > I thought that the direction of the discussion was promising. A > bespoke format, though more work, is entirely justified in this case. Ditto. I was okay with JSON only for the short period where the Draft was speaking of it as the format for use in RFCs (as replacement for ABNF) not on-wire format for delivery. What will be will be, but I wont pretend to like it (JSON). Even YAML would be better than JSON, but that would require use of obs-fold. Amos
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 07:04:00 UTC