Re: Connection-level rejection of oversized DATA frames?

On 26 January 2015 at 15:29, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> But as this is at least the second thread on which we've seen this misread, is there an editorial change that would make it clearer?  (Personally, I think it's pretty clearly stated, but perhaps we need suggestions from the people who didn't read it that way.)

(Me too.)

I'm happy to entertain a narrowly-scoped, editorial change.  The
window of opportunity is closing though.

Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 23:57:36 UTC