- From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:29:11 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Jonathan Thackray <jthackray+http2@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
But as this is at least the second thread on which we've seen this misread, is there an editorial change that would make it clearer? (Personally, I think it's pretty clearly stated, but perhaps we need suggestions from the people who didn't read it that way.) -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 3:07 PM To: Mike Bishop Cc: Jonathan Thackray; ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Connection-level rejection of oversized DATA frames? On 26 January 2015 at 14:34, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > An endpoint can end a connection at any time. In particular, an endpoint MAY choose to treat a stream error as a connection error. My favourite part of the spec. I see a lot of that going on, and I think that it's healthy.
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 23:29:40 UTC