W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

RE: Connection-level rejection of oversized DATA frames?

From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:29:11 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Jonathan Thackray <jthackray+http2@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BL2PR03MB132A9C7C2D4BA00ACB1A57987350@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
But as this is at least the second thread on which we've seen this misread, is there an editorial change that would make it clearer?  (Personally, I think it's pretty clearly stated, but perhaps we need suggestions from the people who didn't read it that way.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 3:07 PM
To: Mike Bishop
Cc: Jonathan Thackray; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Connection-level rejection of oversized DATA frames?

On 26 January 2015 at 14:34, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> An endpoint can end a connection at any time. In particular, an endpoint MAY choose to treat a stream error as a connection error.

My favourite part of the spec.  I see a lot of that going on, and I think that it's healthy.
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 23:29:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC