On 25 January 2015 at 10:57, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > OK, then maybe put ALPN in the header field's name to remove the > ambiguity, because there there's nothing that makes it obvious > that TLS is in use at all, and the name makes one think it's the > protocol being tunnelled which is named instead of the one inside > TLS. I've always considered the name on this draft to be weak. But I haven't found a name that I liked better. Please send suggestions.Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 00:00:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC