- From: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:19:35 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- CC: Jonathan Thackray <jthackray+http2@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
A possibility would be to change the definition of the stream error to: An error in an individual stream is a stream error. An endpoint MAY choose to treat a stream error as a connection error. Or just put the second sentence after the definitions of connection and stream errors. Hervé. On 01/27/2015 12:57 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 26 January 2015 at 15:29, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: >> But as this is at least the second thread on which we've seen this misread, is there an editorial change that would make it clearer? (Personally, I think it's pretty clearly stated, but perhaps we need suggestions from the people who didn't read it that way.) > > (Me too.) > > I'm happy to entertain a narrowly-scoped, editorial change. The > window of opportunity is closing though. >
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 16:20:08 UTC