W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Connection-level rejection of oversized DATA frames?

From: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:19:35 +0100
Message-ID: <54C7BA97.7010705@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
CC: Jonathan Thackray <jthackray+http2@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
A possibility would be to change the definition of the stream error to:

An error in an individual stream is a stream error. An endpoint MAY 
choose to treat a stream error as a connection error.

Or just put the second sentence after the definitions of connection and 
stream errors.


On 01/27/2015 12:57 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 15:29, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> But as this is at least the second thread on which we've seen this misread, is there an editorial change that would make it clearer?  (Personally, I think it's pretty clearly stated, but perhaps we need suggestions from the people who didn't read it that way.)
> (Me too.)
> I'm happy to entertain a narrowly-scoped, editorial change.  The
> window of opportunity is closing though.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 16:20:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC