W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Other work items

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 07:50:49 +1000
Message-ID: <CACweHNBcy+-BrzNW+oX0mSanJ9pau=EYx3-cg-kpUMeogBUYkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 June 2014 05:00, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi Julian,
>
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 4:55 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > There are also other things to think about for future HTTP work, such
> as, in no particular order:
> >
>
​[...]​

> > - addressing the C-E/Range Request issue
>
> That needs a draft and a serious amount of discussion on-list first; two
> hours in a room in Toronto are not going to move it significantly forward
> if we don’t have those first.
>
> Is anyone writing a draft here?
>
>
I'm thinking about it
, but I'm not​
​ sure what approach to take. I have the start of a h2 extension-based
draft here, but that's only the tip of the iceberg.


> [...]

>
> > - common header field syntax (JSON?)
>
> This is VERY speculative (although I have thought about it too). I-D?
>
>
Or perhaps revisiting draft-snell-httpbis-bohe.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/


On 14 June 2014 05:00, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi Julian,
>
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 4:55 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > There are also other things to think about for future HTTP work, such
> as, in no particular order:
> >
> > - how to handle RFC723? errata
>
> That’s an administrative issue; we don’t need to be in the same room to
> figure it out.
>
>
> > - addressing the C-E/Range Request issue
>
> That needs a draft and a serious amount of discussion on-list first; two
> hours in a room in Toronto are not going to move it significantly forward
> if we don’t have those first.
>
> Is anyone writing a draft here?
>
>
> > - enhanced discover of C-E support
>
> Again, we need a draft. Is anyone writing?
>
>
> > - common header field syntax (JSON?)
>
> This is VERY speculative (although I have thought about it too). I-D?
>
>
> > ...essentially all HTTP related topic that have come up in the past but
> was but aside due to other priorities.
>
> Indeed, these things are in-scope for our WG. However, we don’t
> necessarily have to meet to make progress on them, especially when they
> haven’t yet been discussed on-list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 21:51:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC