- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:00:23 -0400
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Julian, On 12 Jun 2014, at 4:55 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > There are also other things to think about for future HTTP work, such as, in no particular order: > > - how to handle RFC723? errata That’s an administrative issue; we don’t need to be in the same room to figure it out. > - addressing the C-E/Range Request issue That needs a draft and a serious amount of discussion on-list first; two hours in a room in Toronto are not going to move it significantly forward if we don’t have those first. Is anyone writing a draft here? > - enhanced discover of C-E support Again, we need a draft. Is anyone writing? > - common header field syntax (JSON?) This is VERY speculative (although I have thought about it too). I-D? > ...essentially all HTTP related topic that have come up in the past but was but aside due to other priorities. Indeed, these things are in-scope for our WG. However, we don’t necessarily have to meet to make progress on them, especially when they haven’t yet been discussed on-list. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 19:00:48 UTC