- From: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:44:17 +0800
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2014 00:44:54 UTC
On 2014–06–13, at 8:42 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > When you see hpack at work it is pretty good. The huffman is ok, with a 50% saving on average, but the differential headers does produce great savings and you can see whole new requests pop out of header frames that are only a few bytes long, even empty header frames. Plus it is kind of fun to play with different encoding strategies. Huffman can only do 50% when the input is restricted to the characters 0, 1, and 2. Caching/differential encoding is where most of the savings currently comes from. The Huffman code saves 29% on its original corpus, which is composed mainly of lowercase words and numbers. Doing better than that should be highly unusual. Anyway, congratulations!
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2014 00:44:54 UTC