Re: Other work items

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 2014-06-13 21:00, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>
>>> - common header field syntax (JSON?)
>>
>>
>> This is VERY speculative (although I have thought about it too). I-D?
>
> Yes.
>

How about support for *alternative* header syntax for existing fields.
Dates, for instance.

We can return to that again later I suppose.

- James

Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 21:38:59 UTC