- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:54:12 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 27/07/2012 12:31 p.m., Jonathan Ballard wrote: > In Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6585 (page ~2) > > I looked at this RFC as if I wanted to derive it into the revision for > 2.0: > """ > HTTP/1.1 428 Precondition Required > Content-Type: text/html > <html> > <head> > <title>Precondition Required</title> > </head> > <body> > <h1>Precondition Required</h1> > <p>This request is required to be conditional; > try using "If-Match".</p> > </body> > </html> > """ > (instead of from scratch) > """ > HTTP/2.0 428 Precondition Required > <head id=428> > Date: <time>&xhtml.now;</time> > <meta> > > Content-Type: text/html+xml > > Title: Precondition Required > </meta> > </head> > > <body itemscope itemtype="urn:http:status"> > <h1 itemprop=name>Precondition Required</h1> > <p itemprop=description>This request is required > to be conditional; > try using "If-Match".</p> > <img itemprop=image /> > > <a itemprop=url /> > </body> > """ I think the thing to notice here is the 295% *increase* in bandwidth consumption for content meta data. After removing the unnecessary whitespace. AYJ
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 05:54:48 UTC