- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:53:50 +1000
- To: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Jonathan / Dzonatas, This is off-topic for this working group. You've been warned privately on several occasions. Consider this a public warning, as per BCP94. If you continue to disrupt the work, your posting privileges will be suspended. On 27/07/2012, at 10:31 AM, Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com> wrote: > In Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6585 (page ~2) > > I looked at this RFC as if I wanted to derive it into the revision for 2.0: > > """ > HTTP/1.1 428 Precondition Required > Content-Type: text/html > > <html> > <head> > <title>Precondition Required</title> > </head> > <body> > <h1>Precondition Required</h1> > <p>This request is required to be conditional; > try using "If-Match".</p> > </body> > </html> > > """ > > (instead of from scratch) > > """ > HTTP/2.0 428 Precondition Required > > <head id=428> > Date: <time>&xhtml.now;</time> > <meta> > > Content-Type: text/html+xml > > Title: Precondition Required > </meta> > </head> > > <body itemscope itemtype="urn:http:status"> > <h1 itemprop=name>Precondition Required</h1> > <p itemprop=description>This request is required > > to be conditional; > try using "If-Match".</p> > > <img itemprop=image /> > > <a itemprop=url /> > </body> > > """ > > I exhausted myself, today, over the idea of the calendar application integration with blogger. What I had on mind was how do we describe: POST /.well-known/509 HTTP/2.0, especially for cloud-containers that do not have nested directories. This is how far I got. I figured GET /.well-known/428 HTTP/2.0 would display the above. > > > Enjoy the Olympics... > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 05:54:22 UTC