- From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:31:00 -0700
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAPAK-5T6tNO9+vRf=SqRyWWU9EqZRt=Q09AMHD1tFOqbRoR7g@mail.gmail.com>
In Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6585 (page ~2) I looked at this RFC as if I wanted to derive it into the revision for 2.0: """ HTTP/1.1 428 Precondition Required Content-Type: text/html <html> <head> <title>Precondition Required</title> </head> <body> <h1>Precondition Required</h1> <p>This request is required to be conditional; try using "If-Match".</p> </body> </html> """ (instead of from scratch) """ HTTP/2.0 428 Precondition Required <head id=428> Date: <time>&xhtml.now;</time> <meta> Content-Type: text/html+xml Title: Precondition Required </meta> </head> <body itemscope itemtype="urn:http:status"> <h1 itemprop=name>Precondition Required</h1> <p itemprop=description>This request is required to be conditional; try using "If-Match".</p> <img itemprop=image /> <a itemprop=url /> </body>""" I exhausted myself, today, over the idea of the calendar application integration with blogger. What I had on mind was how do we describe: POST /.well-known/509 HTTP/2.0, especially for cloud-containers that do not have nested directories. This is how far I got. I figured GET /.well-known/428 HTTP/2.0 would display the above. Enjoy the Olympics...
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 00:31:27 UTC