- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:33:30 +0200
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:20:12AM -0700, Tim Bray wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > If the client retries the request, it might indeed work again -- depending > > on what network path they're using, etc. That's why all of the > > intermediation-focused errors are in 5xx. > > > > Hm? Surely the expectation would be the opposite; legislative/legal > changes typically have timeframes measured in years or at the quickest > months. -T I agree Tim. In my opinion it's just like a "403 forbidden" with a specific reason for this being administratively forbidden. Willy
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 16:35:36 UTC