- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:33:43 -0700
- To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com>, patrick mcmanus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcRXj3LLPM5wM0WVEutKumqdvDwA0kzenmSD-r58O=RdA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > HTTP over UDP also allows us to imagine the speed ideal -- a two round > trip web page load, one request for root/click request and concurrent > requests for all contained objects. The ideal is actually one round trip, plus page_bytes/link_bandwidth. > If this is done over a reliable UDP each object can have independent > packet accounting so problems retrieving it anywhere along the path has no > impact on other objects. It's the fastest, most robust way to load a page. > Pages without content inter-dependencies, super large objects, slow > javascripts, and fast web servers (a lot of ifs I know) could load on first > time visits in under 100 ms over high bandwidth, low latency networks. Nice! > > Of course there are lots of new problems created by moving away from a > connection-oriented transport in general and TCP in particular but this was > a question about the advantages. > > There are very large and scary beasts in the waters of the unexplored country of defining an application-layer transport without regard to larger factors such as... not crashing the internet, and that is without considering how to deal with packet loss :) I'd propose that, while such things are interesting, solving a transport problem is decidedly not in scope of the WG. -=R Peter > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:17 PM, tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com> wrote: > >> we didn't really make any testbench for HTTPP by now. However, we tried >> HTTPP to streaming Movie with HTML5 video tag, it perform well. >> >> AFAIK, run HTTP over UDP has two particular benefits: >> 1. easy to setup P2P communication between browsers like what WebRTC to do >> 2. leverage both HTTP power with UDP's performance for video/audio App >> using HTML5 video/audio tag. >> >> And, UDP is message-oriented, suppose doing HTTPP encryption or >> compression is more efficient than stream-oriented transport like TCP. >> >> Best regards >> Tom >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:21 PM, patrick mcmanus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>wrote: >> >>> cool. What did you learn from the project about the efficacy of udp? >>> >>> >>> On 4/7/2012 10:15 AM, tom wrote: >>> >>> attach HTTPP firefox-11.0 win7 extension. >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:11 PM, tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guys: >>>> >>>> we studied on HTTP over UDP two years and implemented HTTPP scheme to >>>> run HTTP over UDP on firefox. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2012 22:34:18 UTC