Re: status code for header fields to big

We already solved the Turing-test, and need not prove this again, and 
again, and not to you. That is the attitude spam has done to machines, 
and we learned to make such arguments done more efficiently. I do not 
eat spam, liberal doesn't mean that choice is pre-made. Simply ask for 
"clarification," instead, is the more polite path than your 
"totally"-dude attitude.

HTTP affects many people, and you can not simply sweep them under the 
rug like they mean nothing in common.

We are beyond proof-of-concept, and we try not "to brag about it," or be 
so prejudice (obvious without public discussion, "RFC").

We already started and ended the discussion elsewhere: "Hydrogen 
Economy" (using "current" technology for proving that bitcoins are 
tangible and reversible).

https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25408.0

Q.E.D.

[We know people are pissed, that is outside the scope of this list, the 
door...]

On 07/03/2011 01:22 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:24:07AM -0700, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>    
>> Due to an off-list discussion, I should mention the concept of
>> virtualization in "bubbles". It's the process of phases changes and
>> possible computations (now simplified to phase-change-memory), requires
>> stateful-transfers (so some think non-stateless discussions is
>> off-topic). There is nothing metaphorical about these ideas in the
>> hydrogen economy, the connection is obvious with those that are familiar
>> with memory technology (sticky subject).
>>      
> Dzonatas, almost all of your mails are totally off-topic and really not
> related to HTTP. Here on this list, people are subscribed to discuss
> protocol issues and possible solutions. Please don't use the list's
> bandwidth for unrelated discussions.
>
> Thank you,
> Willy
>
>
>    


-- 
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant

Received on Sunday, 3 July 2011 20:39:19 UTC