Re: status code for header fields to big

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 01:38:17PM -0700, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> We already solved the Turing-test, and need not prove this again, and 
> again, and not to you. That is the attitude spam has done to machines, 
> and we learned to make such arguments done more efficiently. I do not 
> eat spam, liberal doesn't mean that choice is pre-made. Simply ask for 
> "clarification," instead, is the more polite path than your 
> "totally"-dude attitude.

Welcome to my .procmail filter then, now going to /dev/null.

Willy

Received on Sunday, 3 July 2011 20:43:38 UTC