- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:51:54 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-01 16:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-07-01 05:52, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Personally - I think 413 is good for this; the response body and/or
>> headers can fine-tune as to why it was rejected (as with any other
>> error response).
>
> I'm not totally convinced; maybe we can treat this as a separate issue
> ("expand scope of 413"?), and make progress on #282 independently of it?
>
>> Recall that we've already tuned the definition of 413 to say
>>
>> The server is refusing to process a request because the request
>> representation is larger than the server is willing or able to
>> process.
>>
>> note 'representation' -- which includes headers.
>
> "Entity", as used in 2616, included the headers as well; so this was
> just a terminology update, right?
>
> Best regards, Julian
I have opened <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/299>
for this question.
Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 16:52:25 UTC