- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:18:55 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-01 05:52, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Personally - I think 413 is good for this; the response body and/or headers can fine-tune as to why it was rejected (as with any other error response).
I'm not totally convinced; maybe we can treat this as a separate issue
("expand scope of 413"?), and make progress on #282 independently of it?
> Recall that we've already tuned the definition of 413 to say
>
> The server is refusing to process a request because the request
> representation is larger than the server is willing or able to
> process.
>
> note 'representation' -- which includes headers.
"Entity", as used in 2616, included the headers as well; so this was
just a terminology update, right?
Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 14:19:24 UTC