Re: status code for header fields to big

On 2011-06-30 19:17, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> So 413 doesn't seem to be used in general for this case.
>>
>> Should it? In that case we should clarify the spec...
>
> We should define new 4xx codes for header block too long and
> header field too long.
>
> ....Roy

We could, but I really really believe we shouldn't try in the context of 
HTTPbis. If we open pandora's box right now it'll be hard to argue 
against other additions.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 13:24:12 UTC