Re: Redirection MUST NOTs

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:00:42AM -0800, David Morris wrote:
> What you propose requires a change to client behavior in a way that
> potentially reduces the integrity of the user interaction for all sites
> because you have a specific site you believe has a valid reason for
> allowing handling the redirect w/o user interaction.

Not at all.  My proposal doesn't require that any client change
behaviour (as they'd still conform to a "SHOULD NOT" requirement).
It just asks that new clients be permitted to auto-redirect if
they have a very good reason to do so.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 16:02:36 UTC