- From: Naresh Agarwal <nagarwal@in.firstrain.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:08:29 +0530
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I'm sorry..it was a typo error... i meant to say that - HTTP, FTP, SMTP, POP, IMAP etc. are "Syncronous", "Connection Less" and "Pull" in nature. regards, Naresh Agarwal > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:27 PM > To: Naresh Agarwal; ietf-http-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Nature of Application Protocols! > > > > HTTP is synchonous, but very much pull, not push. > > Regards, Martin. > > > At 12:39 02/08/29 +0530, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > > >Hi > > > >I have some general questions regarding protocols. > > > >Every application protocol is - > > > >1)Synchronous or Asynchrnous > >2)Connection Less or Connection Oriented > >3)Push or Pull > > > >My understanding is that most of the protocols - HTTP, FTP, > SMTP, POP, > >IMAP etc. are "Syncronous", "Connection Less" and "Push" in nature. > > > >I could not find any protocol, which is widely used and is > Asynchronus, > >Connection Oriented and Pull in nature! > > > >Am i right or i'm missing something? > > > >Also does Synchrony and Pull, Asynchrony and Push are > synonyms..i.e every > >Synchronous protocol is Push and every Asynchronous protocol > is Push..? > > > >Can somebody provide me with the explanation of above (if > possible, with > >examples)? > > > >thanks, > >regards, > >Naresh Agarwal > >
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 04:36:54 UTC