Re: Moving HTTP 1.0 to informational

> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0
> doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server
> does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST
> is not allowed...).

That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and
AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not

I don't know of any CLIENTS that pay attention to the Allow header,
though, which would also imply that it should come out of the draft.


Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:03:35 UTC